Primary Maths Mistakes in Singapore: What Fixes Work
After years of tutoring Primary students in Singapore, here are the maths mistakes we see regularly — and the practical strategies that work.
Min HuiFounder & Mathematics Educator • (Updated: ) • 8 min read
Reviewed by Charmaine (Early Childhood Education Specialist)

The six most common Primary Maths mistakes in Singapore are: careless calculation errors, misreading problem sums, choosing wrong heuristics, poor time management, unclear working, and weak fraction/ratio foundations. Most are fixable through targeted practice and habit-building rather than more drilling. These align with common issues identified in the MOE Primary Mathematics syllabus requirements.
As someone who has taught Primary Mathematics for over a decade and founded Ancourage Academy, I have tracked these patterns across hundreds of students. They account for the vast majority of marks lost in Primary Maths exams, appearing consistently across schools and ability levels. Below is what we see and what actually works.
The "Careless" Mistakes That Are not Careless
Careless maths mistakes are rarely about carelessness — they are habit problems caused by rushing through familiar operations without systematic checking. Students make decimal alignment errors, forget carry-overs, and confuse fraction conversions because they have not built reliable checking routines, not because they do not care. The fix requires building new habits, not just trying harder.
Decimal and fraction errors top the list by a wide margin. "Hopefully he can eradicate careless mistakes" — we hear versions of this concern from families every week.
You know the symptoms — misaligned decimal points, forgotten carry-overs, fraction conversion errors, sign mistakes with negatives. Sound familiar?
These are not really "careless" mistakes. They are habit problems. Students rush through familiar operations without checking.
What works: systematic checking routines (in a specific order, not random), estimation before calculating, writing bigger and clearer, and taking one step at a time. No mental shortcuts until the foundation is solid.
With small classes of 3-6 students, tutors can spot calculation errors immediately and address them before they become habits.
Solving the Wrong Problem Entirely
Students solve the wrong maths problem when they miss key words like "remaining," "each," or "altogether" in problem sums. The fix is a four-step structured reading approach: read once for the overall picture, read again to underline key information, circle the actual question, and identify what units you are finding. This systematic approach prevents students from solving a completely different problem than what was asked.
For PSLE preparation, nothing hurts more than this. Students solve the wrong problem entirely because they missed a key word.
The usual culprits? Missing "remaining" or "left" (solving for total instead), confusing "more than" with "times as many", overlooking "each" or "altogether". The student solves a completely different problem.
The fix is a structured reading approach. Read once for the overall picture. Read again to underline key information. Circle the actual question. Identify what units you are finding. Four steps, every time.
One student kept losing marks despite knowing her stuff. Turned out she was not reading the questions carefully enough. Once we trained her on that, her marks shot up. The knowledge was already there.
When Bar Models Go Wrong
Students choose the wrong maths strategies because strategy selection is not taught explicitly. Bar models work best for "before and after" problems. Ratio problems need the unchanged-quantity approach. "What if" problems require working backwards. Pattern problems need rule-finding first. When students learn to categorise problems before solving them, strategy selection becomes automatic rather than random.
Primary Maths increasingly requires heuristics (problem-solving strategies) like model drawing, working backwards, or guess-and-check. Students often know multiple strategies but choose the wrong one.
Students use bar models when algebra would be simpler. They guess-and-check when there is a clear pattern. They draw overly complex models for straightforward problems. Or they switch strategies mid-problem when stuck.
Strategy selection needs explicit teaching. Bar models work best for "before and after" scenarios. Ratio problems need the unchanged-quantity approach. Work backwards from "what if" scenarios, and identify rules before calculating patterns.
Students practise categorising problems before solving them. Over time, strategy selection becomes automatic.
Three Questions Left, Two Minutes Remaining
Poor time management in maths exams comes from spending too long on hard questions early, over-checking easy questions, and having no clock awareness until the final minutes. The solution involves regular timed practice, knowing paper structure, using the "skip and return" rule for questions taking over 2-3 minutes, and checking the clock at set intervals throughout the paper.
"Her time management still not there yet. Last week modular test, she didn't attempt 3 questions!" — a recurring concern from parents.
Heartbreaking: students who know the content but cannot finish the paper.
Too long on hard questions at the start. Overkill on easy questions. No time awareness until five minutes left. Then panic sets in.
Time management comes from regular timed practice. Know the paper structure and allocate time per section. Use the "skip and return" rule: if a question takes more than 2-3 minutes, mark it and move on. Do full-length timed papers, not just question practice. Check the clock at set intervals.
Where Did Your Method Marks Go?
Students lose method marks even when their thinking is correct. In PSLE, showing working is not optional; it is where marks come from.
The pattern is frustratingly common — mental calculation with no written steps, messy working that is hard to follow, missing units, jumping straight to answers without showing method.
We treat presentation as seriously as content. Every step earns marks. Bar models need clear labels. A 4-mark question needs more than one line of working. We drill this until it becomes habit.
The Fraction Problem Nobody Talks About
Fractions and ratios cause more confusion than any other Primary Maths topic. These concepts are abstract, and many students never build solid understanding before moving on.
Students do not understand equivalent fractions conceptually. They struggle converting between fractions and decimals. They apply ratios mechanically without understanding. They confuse "fraction of" with "ratio".
Sometimes you need to go back to foundations. No shame in that. Use visual aids: fraction bars, pie charts, physical manipulatives. Use real-world examples: pizza slices, money, sharing scenarios. Make explicit connections: "This fraction problem is the same as this ratio problem." Build from concrete to abstract.
We had one boy who could not touch fractions without getting frustrated. Turned out his P3 foundations were shaky. Once we went back to basics — actual pie charts, physical fraction bars — things clicked. His father said he "improved a lot" within two months.
The Confidence Factor
Many students who make these mistakes have an underlying issue: they have lost confidence in Maths.
One message that stuck with us, from a P4 parent: "They used to cry when doing maths homework. Now they actually try on their own first before asking for help." That shift is what we work towards.
Students who fear Maths:
- Rush through problems just to finish
- Surrender on harder questions before really trying
- Skip showing working — doubt makes them hide their process
- Panic during exams
Rebuilding confidence tends to be the first step. We start where students are comfortable, celebrate small wins, and gradually build difficulty. Many students who come to us saying they "hate Maths" eventually enjoy it.
What Changes Look Like
One student came to us with a C6. Within two terms, she was scoring A1. Not because she suddenly became smarter, but because we found the specific gaps and fixed them one by one.
Another boy used to skip every word problem. "Too hard," he would say. Now he attempts everything. He does not get them all right, but he tries. That is the first step.
The transformation that matters most is not grades. It is watching a child go from "I hate maths" to actually looking forward to lessons.
Finding the Gaps
If your child is making these mistakes, start by figuring out exactly where the gaps are. A diagnostic assessment (even an informal one) helps pinpoint what needs work.
We offer trial sessions where we assess your child's current level and give you an honest recommendation on next steps. Sometimes that recommendation is "your child is fine, just needs more practice at home." We would rather tell you that than take your money for tuition you do not need.
Explore our Primary Mathematics programmes if you want to learn more about our approach.
After all these years of teaching, one thing remains true: every child can improve at maths. It is not about being "naturally good" at numbers. It is about finding the gaps, building the habits, and restoring the confidence. We have seen it happen hundreds of times, and it never gets old.
One last thing: that boy who used to skip every word problem? Last month he came in grinning, waving a test paper. "Teacher, I tried all of them!" He did not get them all right. But he tried. That is where improvement starts.
Common Questions About Primary Maths
At what age do maths mistakes become a concern?
If your child consistently loses marks on the same error types by Primary 3-4, that is worth addressing. Small gaps compound quickly — a shaky P3 foundation affects P5-6 problem sums significantly.
How long does it take to fix careless mistakes?
In our experience, consistent practice on checking routines leads most students to show improvement within 4-6 weeks. Complete habit change typically takes 2-3 months of regular reinforcement.
Should I focus on weak topics or overall practice?
Target weak topics first. Spreading effort across everything often means nothing improves substantially. Once foundations are solid, then broaden practice. The SEAB PSLE format tests specific competencies — knowing which ones to prioritise helps focus revision.
Related: Is Tuition Worth It? • Building Language Foundations